The History News Network recorded this video of Andrew J. Bacevich speaking at the Annual Meeting of the American Historical Association in Chicago, IL, on January 7, 2012. Topic: George C. Marshall Lecture on Military History
Michael Few is a retired military officer who served multiple combat tours to Iraq including the Thunder Runs and The Surge, and he currently serves as the editor of Small Wars Journal.He is a graduate of the United States Military Academy and studied small wars at the Defense Analysis Department at the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, CA
In summation: The Stupid Little People are manipulated into a militaristic frenzy by a mysterious cabal of war-loving politicians and Hollywood producers. It's just that obvious!
This Smedley Butler-esque critique is profoundly old and tiresome ("the sucker class" was Butler's term for the hoi polloi). This speech does not represent serious scholarship.
War is assuredly a much abused policy instrument, but not for the simplistic reasons that Gramsci, uhhh... I mean, Bacevich suggests. They are both much more profound (particularly the cultural imperatives and diplomatic intracacies) and mundane (the fundamental cluelessness of policy-makers since time immemorial) than he chooses to admit.
Naturally, Bacevich cites nations like Germany, France and England as the moral and intellectual superiors of the cretinous and easily-fooled Americans. Yet, I recall an Englishman who, on the subject of war, once put the following words in the mouth of a Danish prince:
This is th'imposthume of much wealth and peace,
That inward breaks, and shows no cause without
Why the man dies.
There's a lot more wisdom in that than Bacevich's speech. And, it's a lot shorter.
Bacevich's remarks are well worth considering. My concern is that he is not the first to utter this sentiment, and the Washington-Hollywood complex (as he terms it) goes on as it has throughout this century. If this struck a chord with you, it would be well worth your time to look at Richard Slotkin's Gunfighter Nation. It is a great look at how entertainers, journalists, and politicians have used popular mythologies to drive foreign policy.
Comments
In summation: The Stupid Little People are manipulated into a militaristic frenzy by a mysterious cabal of war-loving politicians and Hollywood producers. It's just that obvious!
This Smedley Butler-esque critique is profoundly old and tiresome ("the sucker class" was Butler's term for the hoi polloi). This speech does not represent serious scholarship.
War is assuredly a much abused policy instrument, but not for the simplistic reasons that Gramsci, uhhh... I mean, Bacevich suggests. They are both much more profound (particularly the cultural imperatives and diplomatic intracacies) and mundane (the fundamental cluelessness of policy-makers since time immemorial) than he chooses to admit.
Naturally, Bacevich cites nations like Germany, France and England as the moral and intellectual superiors of the cretinous and easily-fooled Americans. Yet, I recall an Englishman who, on the subject of war, once put the following words in the mouth of a Danish prince:
This is th'imposthume of much wealth and peace,
That inward breaks, and shows no cause without
Why the man dies.
There's a lot more wisdom in that than Bacevich's speech. And, it's a lot shorter.
Bacevich's remarks are well worth considering. My concern is that he is not the first to utter this sentiment, and the Washington-Hollywood complex (as he terms it) goes on as it has throughout this century. If this struck a chord with you, it would be well worth your time to look at Richard Slotkin's Gunfighter Nation. It is a great look at how entertainers, journalists, and politicians have used popular mythologies to drive foreign policy.