Small Wars Journal

3 September SWJ Roundup

Fri, 09/03/2010 - 7:27am
Middle East Peace Talks

U.S. Launches Direct Mideast Peace Talks - Voice of America

Rivals in Middle East Fast-Track Talks - Wall Street Journal

Middle East Talks Begin with Work Plan - Los Angeles Times

Netanyahu, Abbas Seek 'Framework' - Washington Times

Settlements in West Bank Are Clouding Peace Talks - New York Times

Hebron Could be Powder Keg as Peace Talks Begin - Los Angeles Times

Hamas Among Intractable Issues in Mideast Talks - Associated Press

Experts Fear Mideast Talks Are Too Ambitious - New York Times

Israel and Palestine: A True One-state Solution - Washington Post opinion

Afghanistan

Gates: More Casualties Expected, Allied Strategy Will Work - Voice of America

Gates Says U.S. Making Progress in Afghan War - Associated Press

Afghanistan Now Has Forces, Resources, Petraeus Says - AFPS

Gates, Karzai Discuss Way Ahead in Afghanistan - AFPS

Petraeus: U.S. To Start NATO Talks on Afghan Transition - Reuters

Afghanistan Gains Come at High Price, General Says - AFPS

U.S. Withdrawal from Iraq Looms Over Afghan War - Voice of America

Taliban in Financial Trouble, General Says - AFPS

2 U.S. Troops Die in Afghanistan - Associated Press

Air Strike Targets Senior Insurgent Leader - AFPS

Deaths Disputed in Afghan Airstrike - Wall Street Journal

Afghan Leader Condemns Air Strike as Gates Arrives - Reuters

Karzai Calls Aide's Arrest Reminiscent of Soviet Times - Washington Post

Depositors Panic Ove Bank Crisis in Afghanistan - New York Times

Afghans Pull Money from Troubled Kabul Bank - Los Angeles Times

Bank Crisis: Karzai Urges Afghans Not to Panic - Washington Post

Karzai Kin Asks U.S. to Bolster His Bank - Wall Street Journal

Afghanistan Assures Bank Customers Amid Graft Fears - Reuters

Our Distracted Commander in Chief - Washington Post opinion

Pakistan

Pakistani Officials Caution Against Large Outdoor Religious Ceremonies - VOA

Police: Attack on Pakistan Minority Mosque Kills 1 - Associated Press

Bomb Kills 1 Police Officer, Wounds 3 in Pakistan - Associated Press

Pakistan Taliban Take Responsibility For Bombings - Reuters

U.S. Military Boosts Pakistan Aid Capabilities - AFPS

Objective in Pakistan is to Help, Mullen Says - AFPS

Pakistan Gets IMF Relief, Tightens Security - Reuters

Iraq

After Iraq War, Uncertainty and Seemingly Mixed Messages - Washington Post

Iran

Security Forces in Evidence Ahead of pro-Palestinian Rallies - Los Angeles Times

Attackers Strike Home of Iranian Opposition Leader - New York Times

Iran Stoning Lawyer Reunited With Family - Associated Press

United Nations

Security Council to Hold Summit on Peace - Associated Press

United States

New Yorkers Want Islamic Center Moved, Poll Finds - New York Times

Justice Department Sues Arizona Sheriff - Washington Post

Justice Dept. Sues Sheriff Over Bias Investigation - New York Times

Justice Dept. Sues Arizona Sheriff - Washington Times

U.S. Sues Arizona Sheriff in Civil Rights Probe - Los Angeles Times

Africa

Mainstream U.S. Media Criticized for Ignoring Developments in Africa - VOA

Sudan's North-South Faultline Worries About War - Associated Press

Sudan Referendum Body Agrees Post to End Deadlock - Reuters

Rape Victims in Congo Raid Now More Than 240 - New York Times

Mozambique Calm After 2 Days of Deadly Food Riots - Associated Press

Mozambique Riots Spotlight World Food Price Spike - Associated Press

Uganda Court Charges 2 Over Deadly Twin Bombings - Associated Press

S. Africa to End Amnesty for Illegal Zimbabweans - Associated Press

Americas and Caribbean

Calderon Acknowledges "Central Threat" of Drug Cartels - Washington Post

Calderon: Violence Price Worth Paying in Drug War - Associated Press

Gun Battle in Northeastern Mexico Leaves 25 Dead - Los Angeles Times

Soldiers Kill 25 in Mexico Gunbattle - Associated Press

Drug Shootout With Army Kills 25 In Mexico - Reuters

Drug Gangs Prey on Migrants In Risky Mexico Journey - Reuters

Massacre Survivor: Victims Refused Narco Work - Associated Press

Ecuadorean Survivor Urges Migrants to Avoid Mexico - Associated Press

Chavez Defends His Record on Crime In Venezuela - Reuters

Election Official: Chavez Breaking Campaign Rules - Associated Press

Salvador Bans Gang Membership After Bus Massacre - Associated Press

5 Police Officers Killed by Road Bomb in Colombia - Associated Press

Despite Embargo, Cuba A Haven For Pirated U.S. Goods - Reuters

Asia Pacific

North Korea Appears Ready to Extend Dynastic Rule - New York Times

U.S. to Send Flood Aid to North Korea - Voice of America

U.S., S. Korea to Hold Further Naval Drills - Associated Press

China Census Highlights Growing Rights Awareness - Associated Press

Journalist Murders in Indonesia Attributed to Low Standards - Voice of America

Central Asia

Suicide Car Bomber Wounds 25 Police In Tajikistan - Reuters

Europe

Book Sets Off Immigration Debate in Germany - New York Times

U.S. Officers Take Up Posts at Paris Airport - Associated Press

Paris Mosque Slams Burger Chain's Muslim Outreach - Associated Press

Serbia Confiscates $256 Million of Crime Property - Associated Press

Muslim Cleric Calls For Beheading Of Dutch Politician - Reuters

Middle East

U.N. Atom Chief Invited Israel to Mull Joining NPT - Reuters

Turkish Action Film Depicts Israeli Raid - New York Times

Wiesenthal Worked for Israeli Spy Agency, Book Alleges - New York Times

Group Promotes Egypt's Spy Chief for President - Associated Press

Egypt TV Show Stirs Debate Over Muslim Brotherhood - Associated Press

South Asia

A Kashmir Hospital Is Witness to Conflict - New York Times

Muslims Use Facebook, YouTube in Kashmir Fight - Associated Press

Million Dollar Militia

Thu, 09/02/2010 - 10:48am
Interesting documentary here, examining the delicate nature and hazards of tribal negotiations in Afghanistan.

The producers are American and it seems to have debuted yesterday on Al Jazeera English's YouTube Channel.

The opening observation that by transacting directly with the tribes they will become independent local governments moves to the root of the tension, as they are already the de facto governments in so many ways absent other trappings of the state yet an enabled central government remains the strategy.

2 September SWJ Roundup

Thu, 09/02/2010 - 8:11am
Middle East Peace Talks

Obama Urges Israel, Palestinians to Seize Opportunity for Peace - VOA

Netanyahu and Abbas to Begin Direct Mideast Peace Talks - New York Times

Obama Urges Mideast Leaders to Make Peace - Washington Post

Tensions Rise as Mideast Talks Begin - Wall Street Journal

Obama Says Time Ripe for Mideast Peace Accord - Los Angeles Times

Obama Urges Mid-East Leaders to Take Opportunity - BBC News

Israel And Palestinians Set For Face-to-Face Talks - Reuters

Israeli Moratorium Key to Talks - Washington Times

Israeli Peace Effort Rests on Netanyahu - New York Times

Gaza Lessons Harden Israeli Views on Security - Voice of America

Netanyahu, Abbas Emerge From Different Routes - Associated Press

Iranian Threat May be Boon for Mideast Peace Talks - Washington Post

Hamas Says Will Continue Attacks on Israelis - Reuters

Afghanistan

Gates in Afghanistan to Meet With Karzai, Petraeus - Associated Press

Afghan, Coalition Troops Kill, Capture Hundreds of Insurgents - AFPS

Near Kandahar, the Prize Is an Empty Town - New York Times

2 American Troops Killed in Afghan Attacks - Associated Press

NATO Checks Claim Air Strike Kills 6 Afghan Campaigners - Reuters

Worried Afghans Withdraw Kabul Bank Deposits - Washington Post

Few Signs of Run on Afghanistan's Kabul Bank - Associated Press

Pakistan

U.S. Charges Pakistani Taliban Leader with Killing Americans - Washington Post

U.S. Charges Pakistani Taliban Leader In CIA Killings - Reuters

Pakistani Taliban Formally Branded a Terrorist Group - Washington Post

3 Bomb Blasts at Shiite Procession in Pakistan - Los Angeles Times

Pakistan Steps Up Security in Lahore After Attacks - New York Times

Pakistan Boosts Security After Lahore Bombs - Reuters

Pakistan Shiites Mourn Those Killed in Triple Bomb - Associated Press

U.S. Continues to Aid Flood-Stricken Pakistanis - AFPS

Cricket Betting Scandal Rocks Pakistan - Los Angeles Times

Iraq

In Iraq, Clear Signs of New U.S. Mission - Washington Post

Biden Says Iraq Close to Forming Government - Reuters

Gates: War in Iraq Over, U.S. Transitioning to Iraqi Forces - AFPS

Biden: U.S. Effort in Iraq Goes On Despite Mission Change - AFPS

Mullen Notes Iraq's Progress from 'Desperate' Situation - AFPS

Odierno Earns Praise for Getting Results in Iraq - AFPS

Iraqi Commanders Say They Are Ready to Handle Security - Voice of America

In Baghdad, U.S. Officials Take Note of Milestone - New York Times

U.S., Iraqis Mark End of Combat Under Cloud of Pessimism - Los Angeles Times

Fix Political Impasse Before You Go, Iraqis Tell U.S. - Reuters

U.S. Forces Still in Fight at End of Combat Mission - Associated Press

The War's Not Over - Washington Post opinion

Iran

Iranian Threat May be Boon for Mideast Peace Talks - Washington Post

WikiLeaks

Supervisor was Worried about Leak Suspect's Mental Health - Washington Post

Sweden Reopens Rape Investigation of WikiLeaks Founder - New York Times

United States

Border Officer Gets 20 Years for Corruption, Smuggling - Los Angeles Times

Ground Zero Mosque Controversy Puts Many U.S. Muslims on Defensive - VOA

Number of Illegal Immigrants in U.S. Fell, Study Says - New York Times

Survey Charts 'Sharp Decline' in Illegals - Washington Times

When Warriors Hurt Themselves - New York Times editorial

Hezbollah Car Bombs on Our Border - Washington Times opinion

Africa

Somalia: In Civil War, Both Sides Embrace Pirates - New York Times

Gunfire Continues in Mozambique; Police Say 4 Dead - Associated Press

U.N.: Number Of Victims In Congo Mass Rape Increases - Reuters

Americas and Caribbean

Calderon: Mexico's Crackdown on Organized Crime Working - Los Angeles Times

Calderon: Mexico Shows Gains in Security, Economy - Associated Press

Mexico 'Drug Kingpin' Edgar Valdez Confesses on Video - BBC News

Grief Across Latin America for Migrant Killings - New York Times

Five Colombian Police Killed by Suspected FARC Bomb - BBC News

Asia Pacific

China Calls for Compromise on N. Korea Talks - Associated Press

Yellow Sea Venue for Rival War Games - Voice of America

Japan's Prime Minister Faces Showdown - Washington Post

Indonesia Urged to Increase Anti-Piracy Patrols - Associated Press

Europe

E.U. Casts Legal Doubt on French Roma Expulsion - New York Times

Middle East

U.S. Funding Boost Is Sought for Yemen Forces - Wall Street Journal

Hamas Accuses Palestinian Authority of Raids Against It - Los Angeles Times

Hamas Claims Responsibility For West Bank Attack - Reuters

U.N. Agency Fails to Stage Nuke-Free Mideast Talks - Associated Press

HRW Urges Bahrain Investigate Torture Claims - Associated Press

Growth of The Iraqi Security Forces

Wed, 09/01/2010 - 2:26pm

Growth of The Iraqi Security Forces

DoD Live

By Lt. Gen. Michael D. Barbero

Along with most of you, I have been watching the ongoing political developments in Iraq closely, but what I've been watching even more closely are the growing capabilities of the Iraqi Security Forces. After seven years of hard and dangerous work, and the certification of the election results, the ISF is ready to take on full responsibility for the internal security of Iraq. Although there continue to be random high profile attacks, the overall violence trends remain encouraging with incidents down more than 90 percent since the height of the U.S.-led surge and down about 50 percent since the ISF took over security responsibility for the cities last June.

On Sept. 1, 2010, Operation Iraqi Freedom will become Operation New Dawn. By that time U.S. forces will be reduced to 50,000, but it's important to understand that this does not signify any reduction in U.S. commitment to the people of Iraq. Rather, it signifies the readiness of the ISF to take on the full breadth of the internal security mission here. As U.S. forces across the country transition from combat operations to advising and assisting, the importance of continued training and professionalization of the ISF will truly come into focus.

Iraq's security forces today are better than ever, in fact almost 8 out of 10 Iraqis have expressed confidence in their ability to do their job, but plenty of hard work remains to ensure the enduring institutional systems and practices are firmly in place to sustain them.

The Ministry of the Interior has fielded a force of more than 410,000 police across the country, which requires a tremendous logistical effort to sustain operations. In July, the warehouse through which most of those supplies flow began to be managed by the Iraqis. This is truly a significant step forward as logistics management emerges as a major focus area in the coming months for both security ministries.

The goods from this warehouse will outfit the 18 Iraqi run police training centers as well. In these centers, U.S. advisors are providing training directly in only a few specialized areas such as forensics, canine teams, counter-explosives, and criminal investigations. While strengthening these skill sets, the Iraqi police are completely in the lead today protecting the people in the cities and gathering evidence when crimes are committed. That evidence goes to one of six forensics labs, which are operational now while even more are planned as the judiciary begins to rely more and more on hard evidence to convict criminals.

The Defense Ministry has put over 245,000 personnel in uniform and has managed to build the world's fastest-growing Army, Navy, and Air Force. They are honing the skills needed to protect the sovereignty of Iraq and help maintain regional stability after December 2011. The Army has the most capable counter insurgency force in the region and is preparing to transition to building more conventional defensive capabilities. The first of 140 M1 tanks will begin rolling in this summer as the Iraqi tank crews prepare to man them. Actively training at 11 Iraqi-run training centers across the country in unprecedented numbers, the Army is working on specialized individual skills and preparing for a large joint training exercise planned for April 2011.

The Air Force now operates more than 100 aircraft, has nearly doubled in personnel in the past year and is set to grow to 10,000 airmen. Iraq is training its own helicopter pilots and is building a cadre of fixed wing trainers who will help provide a steady flow of skilled flyers to defend Iraq's skies well into the next decade. On Election Day the Air Force flew more than 120 sorties, providing intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance with real time downlinks to national command centers. They also provided essential airlift and battlefield mobility.

The Iraqi Navy is also growing in size and capabilities. They possess more than 50 vessels, used to protect off shore oil infrastructure, territorial waters and the commercial ports. The navy now conducts 50 patrols a month in this mission, a 300% increase in patrols from this time last year. They have been fully responsible for securing one of the two critical oil platforms for over six months. Additionally, the first of 15 new, US-built patrol boats arrive later this summer and the second group of 50 Iraqi sailors will soon be training in Louisiana.

Iraqi counterterrorism forces are now very experienced and effective as they run both independent and joint operations maintaining pressure on violent extremists in Iraq.

So I have no doubt that the ISF are ready to take on the mission September 1 and to successfully take the first steps toward what will indeed be a new dawn for the people of Iraq. The six, U.S. advise and assist brigades will be working at the tactical and unit level while we at A&T will continue to assist at the ministerial and strategic level. We will remain partnered every step of the way as the ISF continue to develop and build their skills until December 2011.

With only 16 more months remaining our work must take on a renewed urgency. In tactical terms, we are in "the last 100 meters". This is the most critical part of the mission, the point when a commander brings all of his resources together to close with and achieve his objective. I believe we are at this point now -- in the last 100 meters of this critical mission.

Army Lt. Gen. Michael D. Barbero is the United States Forces-Iraq, Deputy Commanding General, Advising and Training. In partnership with the Government of Iraqi, DCG A&T develops professional Iraqi security ministries and forces that are capable of maintaining internal security and defending against external threats; on order, transition designated missions, organizations, and other functions to other USG agencies.

1 September SWJ Roundup

Wed, 09/01/2010 - 6:30am
Iraq

Obama: Time To Turn The Page On Iraq - Voice of America

Obama Says Iraq Combat Mission Is Over - New York Times

'Time to Turn the Page' on the Iraq War - Washington Post

Obama Marks End of Iraq Combat - Los Angeles Times

Obama Sees Iraq Vow Fulfilled - Washington Times

Pushing Onward to Other Battles - Boston Globe

Obama Says 'Time to Turn the Page' on Iraq - San Francisco Chronicle

Obama: U.S. Combat in Iraq Over; Time to 'Turn the Page' - USA Today

Obama on End of U.S. Combat in Iraq - BBC News

Obama Makes Oval Office Speech to End Iraq Fighting - Daily Telegraph

Obama Marks End of Iraq Combat Mission - Voice of America

Obama Tells Troops, 'Our Task in Iraq Is Not Yet Over' - New York Times

Obama Thanks Servicemembers for Iraq War Contributions - AFPS

Gates: No Victory Celebration for Iraq as Mission Changes - Voice of America

Iraq Has Chance Now, Thanks to U.S. Servicemembers - AFPS

Biden Visits Iraq to Mark Operation New Dawn - AFPS

Biden Meets with Top Iraqi Politicians - Washington Post

Gates Arrives in Iraq as Combat Mission Ends - Associated Press

PM Says Iraq Independent After U.S. Combat Role Ends - Associated Press

Iraqi Commanders Say They Are Ready to Handle Security - Voice of America

Iraq's Citizens Move Forward with Uncertainty - Washington Post

Iraq Hails Sovereignty as U.S. Departs - Reuters

A Fragile Turning Point - New York Times

Reflections on Iraq: A Vacuum of Authority - New York Times

Analysis: Has Iraq War Really Ended for Obama, U.S.? - Associated Press

Few Iraqis Have a Clear View of the Future - New York Times

Iraqis Judge America's Seven Years in Their Country - New York Times

Does Bush Deserve More Credit for Iraq? - Washington Times

Troops, Families Glad to Hear End to Iraq Combat - Associated Press

Iraq to Spend $13B on U.S. Arms, Equipment - USA Today

A Colleague Killed, a Conversation Cut Short - New York Times

''Tony Blair: I Cried for Iraq War Victims'' - Associated Press

Combat, Hardship Pays Remain for Troops Serving in Iraq - AFPS

The War in Iraq - New York Times editorial

Afghanistan

Gates Hails Shift in Focus to Afghanistan - Washington Post

Petraeus: Taliban Footprint 'Spreading' - Agence France-Presse

'Tough Slog' Remains Ahead in Afghanistan - AFPS

Gates: Commanders Have Resources to Win in Afghanistan - AFPS

Corruption Probe Ruffles U.S.-Afghan Relations - Associated Press

Five More U.S. Soldiers Killed in Afghanistan - Voice of America

Five U.S. Troops Killed in Afghanistan - Washington Post

U.S. Troop Deaths in Afghan War Up Sharply - Washington Post

Bomb Attacks Kill Twenty-one U.S. Soldiers in 48 Hours - Daily Telegraph

Officials Confirm Capture of Insurgent Leader - AFPS

Bomb Attack Kills Afghan Muslim Religous Leader - Associated Press

Afghan Authorities Take Over Biggest Bank to Avoid Meltdown - Washington Post

Afghan Government Moves to Bolster Leading Bank - New York Times

Afghan Ambassador His Post in Washington - Washington Post

Pakistan

Pakistani Military Delegation Heads Home in Protest - Washington Post

Pakistan Army Cancels U.S. Trip Amid Search Dispute - Associated Press

Pakistan Army Cancels U.S. Talks Over Security Checks - Reuters

U.N. Heads Appeal for More Pakistan Flood Relief - Voice of America

Pakistani Implores World to Help after Floods - Washington Times

Pakistani Jets Target Militant Hideouts, 45 Killed - Associated Press

Pakistan Raids Kill 45 Militants, Family Members - Reuters

Flood Relief is in America's Strategic Interest - Washington Post editorial

Iran

Newspaper Reiterates Remarks about French First Lady - Washington Post

U.S. Department of Defense

Gates Talks Pentagon Reform with American Legion - AFPS

United States

Confronting Multiple Problems, Obama Faces Tough Odds - New York Times

Appeals Court Backs Away From War Powers Ruling - New York Times

Guantanamo Trial of Canadian to Resume in October - Associated Press

New York Imam: Mosque Fight About Muslim Role - Associated Press

Muslims Debate FBI Presence at Mosques - Washington Post

Loosening of Controls on Exports Draws Fire - Washington Times

Signs in Arizona Warn of Smuggler Dangers - Washington Times

U.S., Netherlands Investigate Possible Airline Terror Plot - Voice of America

Terror Probe May be False Alarm - Washington Post

Terrorist Ties Doubted in Amsterdam Arrests - New York Times

Annual Rankings of Federal Workplaces - Washington Post

Africa

Aid Groups Say S. Sudan Soldiers Target Aid Workers - Associated Press

Floods In South Sudan Leave Nearly 60,000 Homeless - Reuters

Zimbabwe Suspends Use of Own Currency - Voice of America

Academic Tackles Chaos of Elections in Nigeria - New York Times

U.N.: Perpetrators of DRC Gang Rapes Must Be Brought to Justice - VOA

U.N. E-Mail Shows Early Warning of Congo Rapes - New York Times

Legacy of Genocide Fuels Political Repression in Rwanda - Voice of America

Rwanda Threatens to Pull Peacekeepers From Darfur - New York Times

Burundi's 'Peace Village' a Unique Effort to Reconcile Ethnic Groups - VOA

Ex-Islamists Walk Free From Libyan Jail - Reuters

Americas and Caribbean

Arrested Mexican Drug Lord May Face U.S. Extradition - Voice of America

Mexico Drug Lord Suspect May Yield Information - Los Angeles Times

Captured Mexican Drug Lord Knew Top Capos - Associated Press

72 Dead Migrants Found in Mexico Tip of Iceberg - Associated Press

8 Dead in Fire Bombing at Bar in Mexican Resort of Cancun - Associated Press

Venezuela Hunger Striker's Death Angers Chavez Foes - Reuters

Drilling in Progress to Save Chilean Miners - Voice of America

Trapped Chilean Miners Forge Refuge - New York Times

Chile: On Ice and in Space, Lessons for Miners - Washington Post

Asia Pacific

China Pushes New Talks with North Korea - Washington Post

N. Korea Seeks Stronger Ties With China - Reuters

In Rural Thailand, an Unappeased Opposition Bides Its Time - New York Times

Philippine Massacre Trial Adjourned Again - Associated Press

Central Asia

In Central Asia, a New Headache for U.S. Policy - Washington Post

Europe

France Mounts Defense of Its Deportation of Roma - New York Times

Middle East

U.S. Launches New Mideast Peace Talks - Voice of America

Direct Talks Between Israeli and Palestinian Leaders to Begin - Washington Post

Clinton Confers With Leaders on Mideast Peace Push - Reuters

Obama's Mideast Push Clouded By West Bank Attack - Reuters

Four Israelis Dead in West Bank Shooting - Voice of America

4 Israelis Shot Dead in West Bank - Washington Post

4 Israelis Killed in West Bank as Peace Summit Nears - Los Angeles Times

Killing of Israeli Settlers Rattles Leaders - New York Times

Hamas: 150 Members Arrested in Wake of Shooting - Associated Press

Israeli Settlers to Resume West Bank Construction - Associated Press

You Ain't Seen This Before - New York Times opinion

A Peace Plan Within Our Grasp - New York Times opinion

President Obama's Address on Iraq

Wed, 09/01/2010 - 4:35am

Washington Post video: Obama declares that combat In Iraq is over.

Remarks of President Barack Obama Oval Office Address on Iraq Washington, D.C. August 31, 2010 (As released by the White House) (Voice of America)

Good evening. Tonight, I'd like to talk to you about the end of our combat mission in Iraq, the ongoing security challenges we face, and the need to rebuild our nation here at home.

I know this historic moment comes at a time of great uncertainty for many Americans. We have now been through nearly a decade of war. We have endured a long and painful recession. And sometimes in the midst of these storms, the future that we are trying to build for our nation -- a future of lasting peace and long-term prosperity may seem beyond our reach.

But this milestone should serve as a reminder to all Americans that the future is ours to shape if we move forward with confidence and commitment. It should also serve as a message to the world that the United States of America intends to sustain and strengthen our leadership in this young century.

From this desk, seven and a half years ago, President Bush announced the beginning of military operations in Iraq. Much has changed since that night. A war to disarm a state became a fight against an insurgency. Terrorism and sectarian warfare threatened to tear Iraq apart. Thousands of Americans gave their lives; tens of thousands have been wounded. Our relations abroad were strained. Our unity at home was tested.

These are the rough waters encountered during the course of one of America's longest wars. Yet there has been one constant amidst those shifting tides. At every turn, America's men and women in uniform have served with courage and resolve. As Commander-in-Chief, I am proud of their service. Like all Americans, I am awed by their sacrifice, and by the sacrifices of their families.

The Americans who have served in Iraq completed every mission they were given. They defeated a regime that had terrorized its people. Together with Iraqis and coalition partners who made huge sacrifices of their own, our troops fought block by block to help Iraq seize the chance for a better future. They shifted tactics to protect the Iraqi people; trained Iraqi Security Forces; and took out terrorist leaders. Because of our troops and civilians --and because of the resilience of the Iraqi people -- Iraq has the opportunity to embrace a new destiny, even though many challenges remain.

So tonight, I am announcing that the American combat mission in Iraq has ended. Operation Iraqi Freedom is over, and the Iraqi people now have lead responsibility for the security of their country.

This was my pledge to the American people as a candidate for this office. Last February, I announced a plan that would bring our combat brigades out of Iraq, while redoubling our efforts to strengthen Iraq's Security Forces and support its government and people. That is what we have done. We have removed nearly 100,000 U.S. troops from Iraq. We have closed or transferred hundreds of bases to the Iraqis. And we have moved millions of pieces of equipment out of Iraq.

This completes a transition to Iraqi responsibility for their own security. U.S. troops pulled out of Iraq's cities last summer, and Iraqi forces have moved into the lead with considerable skill and commitment to their fellow citizens. Even as Iraq continues to suffer terrorist attacks, security incidents have been near the lowest on record since the war began. And Iraqi forces have taken the fight to al Qaeda, removing much of its leadership in Iraqi-led operations.

This year also saw Iraq hold credible elections that drew a strong turnout. A caretaker administration is in place as Iraqis form a government based on the results of that election. Tonight, I encourage Iraq's leaders to move forward with a sense of urgency to form an inclusive government that is just, representative, and accountable to the Iraqi people. And when that government is in place, there should be no doubt: the Iraqi people will have a strong partner in the United States. Our combat mission is ending, but our commitment to Iraq's future is not.

Going forward, a transitional force of U.S. troops will remain in Iraq with a different mission: advising and assisting Iraq's Security Forces; supporting Iraqi troops in targeted counter-terrorism missions; and protecting our civilians. Consistent with our agreement with the Iraqi government, all U.S. troops will leave by the end of next year. As our military draws down, our dedicated civilians --diplomats, aid workers, and advisors --are moving into the lead to support Iraq as it strengthens its government, resolves political disputes, resettles those displaced by war, and builds ties with the region and the world. And that is a message that Vice President Biden is delivering to the Iraqi people through his visit there today.

This new approach reflects our long-term partnership with Iraq--one based upon mutual interests, and mutual respect. Of course, violence will not end with our combat mission. Extremists will continue to set off bombs, attack Iraqi civilians and try to spark sectarian strife. But ultimately, these terrorists will fail to achieve their goals. Iraqis are a proud people. They have rejected sectarian war, and they have no interest in endless destruction. They understand that, in the end, only Iraqis can resolve their differences and police their streets. Only Iraqis can build a democracy within their borders. What America can do, and will do, is provide support for the Iraqi people as both a friend and a partner.

Ending this war is not only in Iraq's interest-- it is in our own. The United States has paid a huge price to put the future of Iraq in the hands of its people. We have sent our young men and women to make enormous sacrifices in Iraq, and spent vast resources abroad at a time of tight budgets at home. We have persevered because of a belief we share with the Iraqi people --a belief that out of the ashes of war, a new beginning could be born in this cradle of civilization. Through this remarkable chapter in the history of the United States and Iraq, we have met our responsibility. Now, it is time to turn the page.

As we do, I am mindful that the Iraq War has been a contentious issue at home. Here, too, it is time to turn the page. This afternoon, I spoke to former President George W. Bush. It's well known that he and I disagreed about the war from its outset. Yet no one could doubt President Bush's support for our troops, or his love of country and commitment to our security. As I have said, there were patriots who supported this war, and patriots who opposed it. And all of us are united in appreciation for our servicemen and women, and our hope for Iraq's future.

The greatness of our democracy is grounded in our ability to move beyond our differences, and to learn from our experience as we confront the many challenges ahead. And no challenge is more essential to our security than our fight against al Qaeda.

Americans across the political spectrum supported the use of force against those who attacked us on 9/11. Now, as we approach our 10th year of combat in Afghanistan, there are those who are understandably asking tough questions about our mission there. But we must never lose sight of what's at stake. As we speak, al Qaeda continues to plot against us, and its leadership remains anchored in the border region of Afghanistan and Pakistan. We will disrupt, dismantle, and defeat al Qaeda, while preventing Afghanistan from again serving as a base for terrorists. And because of our drawdown in Iraq, we are now able to apply the resources necessary to go on offense. In fact, over the last 19 months, nearly a dozen al Qaeda leaders --and hundreds of Al Qaeda's extremist allies--have been killed or captured around the world.

Within Afghanistan, I have ordered the deployment of additional troops who--under the command of General David Petraeus --are fighting to break the Taliban's momentum. As with the surge in Iraq, these forces will be in place for a limited time to provide space for the Afghans to build their capacity and secure their own future. But, as was the case in Iraq, we cannot do for Afghans what they must ultimately do for themselves. That's why we are training Afghan Security Forces and supporting a political resolution to Afghanistan's problems. And, next July, we will begin a transition to Afghan responsibility. The pace of our troop reductions will be determined by conditions on the ground, and our support for Afghanistan will endure. But make no mistake: this transition will begin -- because open-ended war serves neither our interests nor the Afghan people's.

Indeed, one of the lessons of our effort in Iraq is that American influence around the world is not a function of military force alone. We must use all elements of our power --including our diplomacy, our economic strength, and the power of America's example --to secure our interests and stand by our allies. And we must project a vision of the future that is based not just on our fears, but also on our hopes --a vision that recognizes the real dangers that exist around the world, but also the limitless possibility of our time.

Today, old adversaries are at peace, and emerging democracies are potential partners. New markets for our goods stretch from Asia to the Americas. A new push for peace in the Middle East will begin here tomorrow. Billions of young people want to move beyond the shackles of poverty and conflict. As the leader of the free world, America will do more than just defeat on the battlefield those who offer hatred and destruction --we will also lead among those who are —to work together to expand freedom and opportunity for all people.

That effort must begin within our own borders. Throughout our history, America has been —to bear the burden of promoting liberty and human dignity overseas, understanding its link to our own liberty and security. But we have also understood that our nation's strength and influence abroad must be firmly anchored in our prosperity at home. And the bedrock of that prosperity must be a growing middle class.

Unfortunately, over the last decade, we have not done what is necessary to shore up the foundation of our own prosperity. We have spent over a trillion dollars at war, often financed by borrowing from overseas. This, in turn, has short-changed investments in our own people, and contributed to record deficits. For too long, we have put off tough decisions on everything from our manufacturing base to our energy policy to education reform. As a result, too many middle class families find themselves working harder for less, while our nation's long-term competitiveness is put at risk.

And so at this moment, as we wind down the war in Iraq, we must tackle those challenges at home with as much energy, and grit, and sense of common purpose as our men and women in uniform who have served abroad. They have met every test that they faced. Now, it is our turn. Now, it is our responsibility to honor them by coming together, all of us, and working to secure the dream that so many generations have fought for --the dream that a better life awaits anyone who is —to work for it and reach for it.

Our most urgent task is to restore our economy, and put the millions of Americans who have lost their jobs back to work. To strengthen our middle class, we must give all our children the education they deserve, and all our workers the skills that they need to compete in a global economy. We must jumpstart industries that create jobs, and end our dependence on foreign oil. We must unleash the innovation that allows new products to roll off our assembly lines, and nurture the ideas that spring from our entrepreneurs. This will be difficult. But in the days to come, it must be our central mission as a people, and my central responsibility as President.

Part of that responsibility is making sure that we honor our commitments to those who have served our country with such valor. As long as I am President, we will maintain the finest fighting force that the world has ever known, and do whatever it takes to serve our veterans as well as they have served us. This is a sacred trust. That is why we have already made one of the largest increases in funding for veterans in decades. We are treating the signature wounds of today's wars post-traumatic stress and traumatic brain injury, while providing the health care and benefits that all of our veterans have earned. And we are funding a post-9/11 GI Bill that helps our veterans and their families pursue the dream of a college education. Just as the GI Bill helped those who fought World War II- including my grandfather- become the backbone of our middle class, so today's servicemen and women must have the chance to apply their gifts to expand the American economy. Because part of ending a war responsibly is standing by those who have fought it.

Two weeks ago, America's final combat brigade in Iraq --the Army's Fourth Stryker Brigade --journeyed home in the pre-dawn darkness. Thousands of soldiers and hundreds of vehicles made the trip from Baghdad, the last of them passing into Kuwait in the early morning hours. Over seven years before, American troops and coalition partners had fought their way across similar highways, but this time no shots were fired. It was just a convoy of brave Americans, making their way home.

Of course, the soldiers left much behind. Some were teenagers when the war began. Many have served multiple tours of duty, far from their families who bore a heroic burden of their own, enduring the absence of a husband's embrace or a mother's kiss. Most painfully, since the war began fifty-five members of the Fourth Stryker Brigade made the ultimate sacrifice --part of over 4,400 Americans who have given their lives in Iraq. As one staff sergeant said, "I know that to my brothers in arms who fought and died, this day would probably mean a lot."

Those Americans gave their lives for the values that have lived in the hearts of our people for over two centuries. Along with nearly 1.5 million Americans who have served in Iraq, they fought in a faraway place for people they never knew. They stared into the darkest of human creations --war --and helped the Iraqi people seek the light of peace.

In an age without surrender ceremonies, we must earn victory through the success of our partners and the strength of our own nation. Every American who serves joins an unbroken line of heroes that stretches from Lexington to Gettysburg; from Iwo Jima to Inchon; from Khe Sanh to Kandahar -- Americans who have fought to see that the lives of our children are better than our own. Our troops are the steel in our ship of state. And though our nation may be travelling through rough waters, they give us confidence that our course is true, and that beyond the pre-dawn darkness, better days lie ahead.

Thank you. May God bless you. And may God bless the United States of America, and all who serve her.

-----

Links to View or Listen to President Obama's Speech:

View using Windows Media

Listen using Windows Media

Listen using MP3

The Last Day of OIF

Tue, 08/31/2010 - 11:45pm
While this specific letter is personal to me, it reflects many letters written and tears torn by countless leaders tonight. While SWJ will publish various essays on the bigger picture of Iraq tomorrow, I thought this was the appropriate closure to OIF for the practitioner.

The Last Day of OIF

Boys, so many of you did not make it to see this day. Honestly, I never thought that I'd see this day. I love y'all and miss you much. I don't know what is going to happen tomorrow. Iraq is still a mess, but, officially, the U.S. heavy involvement is done.

Today is a strange day. The Army promoted me to major. Andy Hilmes is about to be a battalion commander. Can you believe that? I'm gonna be who I set out to be. I promised y'all that I would do my best. I stayed the course.

I wish that y'all were all here to see it. I wish that I could write a letter to each one of you, but I can't. There's too many- 30 of y'all to date not counting Afghanistan. I'm gonna start at the beginning.

SSG Stevon A. Booker 34, of Apollo, Pennsylvania

Killed by enemy fire in Iraq during a raid into Baghdad. He was assigned to A Company, 1st Battalion, 64th Armor Regiment, Fort Stewart, Georgia. Died on April 5, 2003.

Book,

Damn brother. It was nine years ago that you and I had staff duty together. I was the cocky West Point grad, rugby player, and 2LT; you were the even cockier tank commander. I loved hanging out with you that night, and I appreciated you taking me under your wing. Dude, you helped me so much as a young officer- your words on leadership and the technical aspects of tanks seared into my memory to this day.

Yeah, you beat me to Baghdad by two days. You were the second tank on the original Thunder Runs. Bobby Ball was leading. After you got shot, we continued on to finish the job. I was close behind flanking first from the west into Baghdad on the 7th. Gilliam was never the same. I suppose that none of us were ever the same.

We took down Baghdad and headed home. Iraq descended into chaos. Your mom and sister showed up to your memorial. I almost lost it. Your sister's smile is as loud as yours. I saw your ghost and shadow in one moment.

Brother, a lot has happened since we last met. Iraq went downhill fast. 3ID was called again and again and again to fix it. For a bit, I was Wildbunch's XO. Then, I moved over to the 82nd to lead some paratroopers. We fixed Iraq as best as we could. Now, it's up to the locals.

I realize that you were probably watching over us this whole time, but I just wanted to write you tonight.

With much love and respect,

Michael

Major James Michael Few is an active duty armor officer with multiple tours to Iraq in various command and staff positions. Currently, he is Editor of Small Wars Journal.

Emerging cyber doctrine replays the CT/COIN debate

Tue, 08/31/2010 - 2:55pm
Last Saturday evening, the Washington Post published an article on the U.S. Defense Department's still-evolving plans for how it intends to defend its computer networks from cyber attacks. Recalling the intellectual struggle over deterrence theory during the early days of the Cold War, the article ended on this note:

The Pentagon has standing rules of engagement for network defense, such as the right of self-defense. But the line between self-defense and offensive action can be difficult to discern.

"This is a big, big problem," said one former intelligence official who noted that it took years to develop nuclear deterrence doctrine. "We are just at the beginning of figuring this out."

But the Pentagon's problem of cyber defense more closely matches the paradigm of insurgency/counterinsurgency than the Cold War structure of deterrence through the threat of retaliation. Saturday's Washington Post article on cyber defense replayed all of the recent arguments of counterterrorism versus counterinsurgency, this time played on the World Wide Web.

The Washington Post article was an interesting follow-up to Deputy Defense Secretary William Lynn's essay on cyber defense in Foreign Affairs, which I covered in my last column at Foreign Policy. The anonymous Pentagon officials in Saturday's article discussed a much more aggressive offensive response to cyber threats compared to Lynn's description in Foreign Affairs. Unwittingly mimicking the 2002 debate over what the U.S. should do about Saddam Hussein's Iraq, these officials discussed the possibility of preemptive cyber strikes against threats lurking inside computer servers located in foreign countries. Other analysts responded with concerns over the legality of such preemptive attacks and speculation whether diplomacy with the countries hosting those servers might be a more effective course.

The parallels with terrorism and insurgency are plain. Cyber insurgents hide amongst "the people" and use the anonymity and the design of the internet to mask their location. According to the Washington Post article, many U.S. officials are unsatisfied with a purely defensive (can we call it pre-9/11?) approach. Similar to advocates of a pro-active "counterterrorism" approach, they favor preemptive raids on emerging cyber threats. In contrast, a "cyber counterinsurgency" approach may be sprouting. This group could be concerned that an aggressive "cyber counterterrorism" approach could have damaging unintended consequences on neutral computer systems, driving their operators away from U.S. interests. Just as with real counterinsurgency, the foreign-located servers are the "population" and "key terrain," which the U.S. must strive to get on its side. And in a guerilla war over computer servers, the U.S. presumably has more to lose than do the insurgents.

Deterrence and retaliation doesn't seem the right model for cyber war. Instead, the emerging debate over cyber defense seems to be a replay of this decade's debates over terrorism and insurgency. Is it a law enforcement problem or a military problem? Pure defense, regardless of how "active," doesn't seem enough; the anonymous attackers have too much of an advantage. Thus calls for preemptive cyber attacks, shutting down threats before they can do crippling damage to the U.S. But are such preemptive attacks legal and might they have unintended consequences, driving more servers to cease cooperating with the U.S.? After Iraq and Afghanistan, counterinsurgents may have another battle to fight, this time "war amongst the servers."