Small Wars Journal

Washington's Afghan Brawl

Thu, 09/03/2009 - 4:40am
Washington's Afghan Brawl - Thomas Rid, Kings of War. (H/T Bernard Finel)

The debate on the pros and cons of Afghanistan is raging inside the Beltway. And it is a bit unsettling.

On the one side are those who say no, America has no national interests in Afghanistan — and yes, it's a war of choice: let's leave the hellhole and get out asap. On the other side are those who say yes, our security is on the line and al-Qaeda must be defeated in Afghanistan — and no, it's a war of necessity: let's do it seriously and pour in more troops and money. Until it's fixed, like Iraq.

You've seen it. Shrill and loud, some of the contributions. The other side is brandished as "foolish" and "not serious." Both sides make up straw-men and then mow them down. And don't look at the reader comments. All that is even more disturbing if you consider that people are dying in this business.

So what should we make of it? As often in verbal fistfights, both sides have a couple of valid points. Let's block out the shouting and try listening to some of the nuances. I would venture to say that most experts should be able to agree on ten assumptions — some of them are just statements of fact...

Much more at Kings of War.

Comments

Small Wars Journal references "the Rights ongoing intramural skirmish over the eminent George Wills latest column," in which Will calls for a withdrawal of U.S. forces from Afghanistan. Wills ire is sparked by American casualties in Afghanistan.

I share Wills dismay and revulsion at horrific life-scarring casualties and the needless loss of American life. That's why, as I argue in NewMajority.Com, one question that policymakers need to ask, but are not now asking, is this:

"What can we do to better protect our ground forces -- our boots on the ground -- to ensure that their casualties are kept to bare minimum?"

http://www.newmajority.com/dont-pull-out-equip-our-troops-to-win

There are, I note, at least five specific things that policymakers can do to better protect American ground forces. These include significantly increasing defense spending to a level that better reflects wartime spending levels and allocating a much greater share of the defense budget to infantry units and ground combat forces.

Pace Will, its not "Time to Get Out of Afghanistan." Instead, its "Time to Invest in Americas Ground Forces."