Private Contractors in Conflict Zones: The Good, the Bad, and the Strategic Impact

Private Contractors in Conflict Zones: The Good, the Bad, and the Strategic Impact by Dr. T.X. Hammes (Col. USMC ret.) has just been posted to the Institute for National Strategic Studies, National Defense University, web site.

Here are the key points from the forum monograph: (1) The United States has hired record numbers of contractors to serve in the conflict zones of Iraq and Afghanistan but has not seriously examined their strategic impact. (2) There are clearly advantages to using contractors in conflict zones, but they have three inherent characteristics that have serious negative effects during counterinsurgency operations. We cannot effectively control the quality of the contractors or control their actions, but the population holds us responsible for everything the contractors do, or fail to do. (3) Contractors compete with the host government for a limited pool of qualified personnel and dramatically change local power structures. (4) Contractors reduce the political capital necessary to commit U.S. forces to war, impact the legitimacy of a counterinsurgency effort, and reduce it’s the perceived morality. These factors attack our nation’s critical vulnerability in an irregular war – the political will of the American people.

Read the entire monograph at INSS.