Member Login Become a Member
Advertisement

SSI Two-Fer

  |  
08.05.2010 at 08:44pm

Two good reads at the US Army War College's

Strategic Studies Institute:

Organizing To Compete in Political Terrain by Dr. Nadia Schadlow.

In this analysis, the author identifies some of the continuing obstacles to

achieving civil-military integration in war. She argues that there are continuing

disagreements about who should lead the shaping of the political landscape in

war and that while doctrine has advanced in this area, good doctrine does not

guarantee the effective execution of governance-related tasks. Sound operational

approaches are required as well.

Got Vision? Unity of Vision in Policy and Strategy: What It Is and Why We Need It

by Dr. Anna Simons

Moving beyond “unity of effort” and “unity of command,” this monograph identifies

an overarching need for “unity of vision.” Without someone at the helm who has a certain kind–not turn, not frame, but kind–of mind, asymmetric

confrontations will be hard (if not impossible) to win. If visionary generals

can be said to possess “coup d’oeil,” then unity of vision is cross-cultural

coup d’oeil. As with strategic insight, either individuals have the ability

to take what they know of another society and turn this to strategic–and war-winning–effect,

or they do not. While having prior knowledge of the enemy is essential, strategy

will also only succeed if it fits “them” and fits “us.” This means that to convey

unity of vision a leader must also have an intuitive feel for “us.”

Both works are well worth a look. They're eminently relevant to current

issues and the broader practice of small wars, and are written by authors we respect a

great deal.

About The Author

Article Discussion: