Blogging On and About Obama’s Nominations
Just back from a quick tour of blogs I frequent – and some I will soon frequent – to see what they are saying – or have said recently – concerning the President-elect’s national security and foreign policy nominations. Not all have commented — here’s what’s what from those that have:
David Ignatius at PostPartisan – This is Obama’s team; he’s clearly in charge. You could see that he wasn’t diminished by the proximity of strong personalities; quite the opposite.
Max Boot at Contentions – As someone who was skeptical of Obama’s moderate posturing during the campaign, I have to admit that I am gobsmacked by these appointments , most of which could just as easily have come from a President McCain.
Steve Coll at Think Tank – The real challenge (and practical fix) for the next Secretary of State is simply to convince Congress to pay for more diplomats. Filling the shortfall of 2,400 or so positions would reduce waiting times for job applicants, but more importantly, it would give our diplomatic corps the time to get out from behind our desks to communicate with locals, the resources to plan for and respond to emergencies and major events, and the career flexibility to get the training we need to be ready for future challenges.
Blake Hounshell at Passport – What will they do in office? It’s too early to tell, but all of these folks, David Sanger observes, “have embraced a sweeping shift of priorities and resources in the national security arena.”
Joshua Keating at Passport – Jones’s thin paper trail may worry partisans, but with Clinton, Joe Biden, Robert Gates, and Susan Rice on his team, Obama probably has enough big egos with well-defined worldviews to advise him on foreign policy. He may be looking for a towering presence who can call BS on wrongheaded recommendations when necessary, a task the 6’4″ Jones seems more than qualified to carry out.
Galrahn at Information Dissemination – The US Navy is a mess right now, and Obama’s decision to retain Secretary Gates can’t be seen as a good thing for US Navy leadership. Think about the gamble facing the Navy with the Obama administration, the argument to change plans just for the DDG-1000 with the current argument expects the Obama administration to come in, override the recommendation of Secretary Gates, hurt the shipbuilding industry (piss off or on the Unions, however you want to call it), spend more money on the alternative Navy plan, build a fleet for a strategic environment best represented by a nuclear war with China, and finally, take action counter to the majority Democratic Congressman and Senators who are supporting the DDG-1000 plan.
David Wood at Military Watch – The threat of nuclear weapons runs through almost every national security decision Obama and his team will make, from terrorism through negotiations with Moscow.
Noah Shachtman at Danger Room – As predicted, Robert Gates will be staying on as Defense Secretary in the new Obama administration. Count me as psyched. I’ve been of fan of Gates’, for quite some time. I wrote this, for example, in June.
Mary Katharine Ham at The Blog – He fell back on his usual dissembling on Iraq, when asked about withdrawal: “Now, remember what I said consistently during the campaign, and you were there for most of it. I said we’d have all combat troops out of Iraq in 16 months, and that there would likely remain a residual force there.” He’s clearly squeaking the door open on staying in Iraq, both with rhetoric and appointments (Jim Jones as National Security Adviser instead of Susan Rice.)
Tom Barnett at Thomas P.M. Barnett – Gates is staying, very exciting to hear!
Dan Froomkin at White House Watch – Rather than simply hire a new brand of loyalists — or replace one gut player with another — Obama is making it clear that he wants his thinking challenged and wants to hear opposing views before he reaches his decisions.
James Joyner at Outside the Beltway – We’re about to see a great shift in resources from the military to other actors, David Sanger argues. In a New Atlanticist piece called “Obama’s Foreign Policy Shift,” I join Matt Yglesias in proclaiming this “a really good idea.”
Jennifer Rubin at Contentions – Certainly much depends on execution of policy, as specific decisions arise for the new administration. But conservatives have little reason to complain about the national security front.
Joe Klein at Swampland – Watching the Obama rollout of his national security team from overseas–I’m in Europe, on my way to Afghanistan–I was struck by the inanity of most of the questions from my colleagues. Granted, these are political reporters, not national security or foreign policy specialists, but what sort of journalist expects the President-elect to tell the “inside story” of how he selected Hillary Clinton?
Jennifer Rubin at Contentions – In responding to a query on his (Obama’s) team’s strong viewpoints and personalities, he again emphasized his commitment to military strength. His emphasis was on strengthening our capabilities “in all dimensions.” (This would seem to mesh with my take that he’s not going to be abandoning “hard” power, but rather attempting to supplement it.)
Judah Grunstein at World Politics Review – I think the political optics of what signal this sends regarding Democrats ability to manage national security rightly take a back seat here to the fact that Gates has been very impressive in effecting the institutional changes necessary to support the operational needs of two ongoing wars. But the Pentagon’s final internal armistice lines (COIN vs. conventional and hard vs. soft power in Iran, for instance) have not been ultimately settled, which means maintaining continuity at the top makes sense for the time being.
Spencer Ackerman at Attackerman – Instead, Obama presented a clear picture of what he intends to do. Withdraw from Iraq along his 16-month timetable, “but I will listen to the recommendations of [military] commanders.” Renew efforts against Al Qaeda in Afghanistan. Confront the proliferation of nuclear weapons. Reduce the dependency on foreign oil. And, as my last post indicated, recalibrate the balance between civilian and military efforts in U.S. national security to use what Vice President-elect Biden called the “totality” of options.
Jules Crittenden at Forward Movement – Wake up and smell the foreign policy! Big day for the incoming Clinton-Bush administration as POTUS-elect Obama Rodham Bush 3 announces the national security team he campaigned against.
Herschel Smith at The Captain’s Jounal – So there seems to be a fundamental difference between Gates and the balance of the team. Gates apparently doesn’t believe in fairy tales and myths, while the demands on the left are for Obama not only to defund the military and engage enemies with dialogue, but to succeed, and that, remarkably so. This administration and the American public are being set up for huge disappointment, but all is not lost.
Mark at The Torch – The shift would create a greatly expanded corps of diplomats and aid workers that, in the vision of the incoming Obama administration, would be engaged in projects around the world aimed at preventing conflicts and rebuilding failed states. However, it is unclear whether the financing would be shifted from the Pentagon.
Steve Field at The D-Ring – With the announcement that Sec. Gates will be staying on at the Pentagon for at least a year during what is described as a “rolling transition,” my attention has turned to the new communications apparatus at the Pentagon.
Editors at New Atlanticist – The incoming administration will face an enormous array of national security challenges. With General Jim Jones’ vision, integrity, and wisdom having such a central role in guiding them, they have a solid foundation.
Westhawk at Westhawk – What about the Obama team’s regional strategy for the Afghan problem? One is likely to get better results from a negotiation when one is bargaining from a position of strength. That doesn’t describe the U.S. position right now, something the Pakistani and Iranian governments know very well.
Antonious Block at Strategy and National Security – I think the idea of keeping Robert Gates as Secretary of Defense until Obama’s own secretary can assemble his team and hit the ground running is brilliant. I also think Clinton will be an excellent Secretary of State (even though I was vehemently opposed to her as a presidential candidate).
Erin Simpson at Abu Muqawama – Victory in our time. Victory for this blog, that is.
