Counterinsurgency and Community Policing in Afghanistan
The Counterinsurgency Training Center–Afghanistan (CTC-A) has established a COIN Training continuum for both the Afghan National Army (ANA) and Afghan National Police (ANP). Currently it is seeking final approval through Afghan National Security Force (ANSF) mechanisms to implement these continuums, build instructor capacity, and support COMISAF intent of building a COIN focused ANSF. The tenets, principles, and best practices of Counterinsurgency (COIN) and Community Policing (CP) are based in the ability of the force applying them to link with the population. In essence, the conduct of population-centric operations via COIN and CP across all battlefield and civil service functions is necessary. This paper will compare COIN and CP as very complimentary methods in theory and execution.
Over the past year, the CTC-A has expanded its training focus from the ANA to include the Afghan National Police (ANP). This has been done to accomplish a better overall Afghanistan Nation Security Forces (ANSF) link to the population and provide tools to boost Afghan population’s perception of the force, as well as equip the ANP with the same attitudes, skills and behaviors we have infused into over 30,000 ANA we’ve trained thus far. This approach is supported by the logical connection between the principles of Counterinsurgency and Community Policing (CP). Before we move forward, a quick definition of both is helpful:
Definition of COIN. Those military, paramilitary, political, economic, psychological, and civic actions taken by a government to defeat insurgency (JP 1-02). The definition of COIN includes the term “paramilitary” which is defined as a group of civilians organized in a military fashion, especially to operate in place of or assist regular army troops. By definition it is necessary to have both military and paramilitary forces working together when combating an insurgency. In Afghanistan the role of “paramilitary” has been assumed by both coalition forces and host nation police forces, with the plan of transitioning to solely to host nation paramilitary/police forces over time.
Definition of Community Policing. Community policing is a philosophy that promotes organizational strategies, which support the systematic use of partnerships and problem-solving techniques, to proactively address the immediate conditions that give rise to public safety issues such as crime, social disorder, and fear of crime (US Department of Justice). Community Policing has many variations across the world depending on societal norms and must be tailored to the community in which it is implemented to achieve effective change, with positive results; however, the above definition is generic enough to make the point and will suffice. Due to the link between the police and the people—as well as the imperative of military COIN forces to link with the people—it must be assumed that the military and policing efforts should be intrinsically linked via the training of the military COIN force in basic policing principles.
Comparing COIN and CP. The “ground level” of government, in any society, that has the closest connection with the population is its police force. This is due to the daily interaction an effective police force has with the population it serves. The police represent “Security Under the Rule of Law” (a COIN principle), and if effective, provide societal law and order. In a COIN campaign, building this force is imperative and proper training must be understood by coalition elements. Regardless of whether the police force is built in the style of Gendarmerie, Caribinieri, or a US-style community/state police force, they will represent the first link to governance and security via the perceptions of the people. Their effectiveness is paramount to maintaining long term stability —and therefore conducting successful COIN operations.
Typically, military forces are utilized in “policing roles” in some capacity, depending on their training and force disposition in the COIN environment. Those forces must understand the principles of COIN and CP and how to operate like a host nation police force, linking with the population to provide security until a host nation police force can assume the role. In any COIN environment, it is sometimes necessary to utilize a purely military approach, employing basic infantry skills to gain a foothold into a contested area. However, as time goes by, military forces that continue to use heavy-handed population resource control measures will wear on the strategic sympathies of the population. Therefore it is important that COIN forces both understand CP as they operate, and also simultaneously train host nation police forces to take over. Below is a chart showing the similarities between basic Community Policing principles and military COIN principles.
Community Policing Principles |
Counterinsurgency Principles |
Collaborative effort between police and citizens/other agencies |
Unity of effort is essential; with civilians, coalition partners, and the host nation |
Shared ownership, decision making, and accountability |
Legitimacy is the main objective in COIN, reinforced by security under the rule of law |
Sustained commitment to public safety |
Counterinsurgents must prepare for, and communicate, a long-term commitment |
Building trust between police and the community |
Conduct population-centric operations in order to gain legitimacy |
Provide skills and knowledge to support community initiatives |
Political factors are primary; evaluate how operations strengthen the host nation |
Ongoing commitment to develop proactive strategies and programs to address the underlying conditions that cause community problems |
Elements must learn and adapt quickly in the COIN environment, consistently addressing the grievances of the population |
Decentralize police services / operations / management |
Empower COIN forces at the lowest levels |
Addressing the root-cause of problems for long term solutions |
Address grievances through population-centric operations |
Commitment to developing new skills through training |
Train host nation forces, and handover to them as soon as is practicable |
Confronting and arresting criminal elements |
Neutralize insurgents through intelligence driven operations |
Unity of Effort. In order to achieve success in the COIN fight, unity of effort must be pursued and eventually achieved. All COIN elements (police/military) must have common goals and a defined mutually supporting end state for the host nation. As we know, in the Afghan COIN environment roles and responsibilities—especially regarding the defeat of guerrilla and insurgent elements—will cross, requiring collaboration based on common skill sets. As an example, the police will be called upon to conduct defensive operations on behalf of a village (military role) and the military will be called upon to conduct basic population and resource control measures such as checkpoints (police role). This fact demonstrates that both forces need to be equipped and trained to perform similar functions and behavior sets that build the confidence of the population.
CP and COIN must overlap in all elements of host nation education, training, and operations. It is the coalition’s responsibility to build that collaboration through training and educating the military and police forces with similar skills, where necessary, and by linking them operationally during the conduct of operations.
Conclusion. COIN is a complex subset of warfare that must address the conditions of the population, addressing their grievances and eventually eliminating the “root causes” for the insurgency. If this is done through unity of effort, long term success will be achieved. In Afghanistan, the primary “root cause” for insurgency is the perception of vulnerability of the population relative to their security needs. The ANSF is the force that will address this, ultimately determining the fate of the population’s perception. In order to do this, the ANSF (both ANA and ANP) must be trained in COIN and how it links with Community Policing. If this is achieved, then the ANA can eventually displace from an area and the ANP will maintain the daily linkages with the population, providing enduring security under the rule of law. Therefore, it is imperative that both COIN and CP principles be inculcated into all ANA and ANP training institutions and that coalition forces consistently reinforce them in all interactions with the ANSF.
The ANA and ANP effort is now being upset by Petraeus’s ALP which harms the populace and destroys national legitimacy.
President Karzai doesn’t like it.
Of course Karzai doesn’t like a lot of other things the U.S. does also, like night raids and drone attacks, but who’s he — only the president of the “Host Nation.”
Adding to Don’s and ITN’s post, at least for the Afghan army, why dont we train it to be first a combined arms fighting army instead of immediately going to a focus on Coin? After all the most adaptable armies are those which are grounded in combined arms and can fight. Those kinds of armies develop units with discipline and cohesion and from that adaptability to whatever confronts them. Since FM 3-24 and the American coin movement has convinced folks in certain quarters that it is the “graduate level of war” we seem to be making the mistake of putting the cart before the horse. Or in another words perhaps we have got the whole construct wrong for the Afghan Army. Anyway it is much easier to teach leaders to drink tea with sheiks and imams and “connect with the population” than it is to teach them how to coordinate combat functions in warfare.
Gentlemen, yes we have translated many US doctrinal publications for the ANSF and may have possibly over-engineered many of our higher level educational models for the ANSF. However, at the CTC-A, we have realized this and have made the comparison between COIN and Community Policing very simple.
We have saturated the ANSF and average training over 5000 ANSF per month with anywhere from 2 hours to 5 days. The principles we teach are very simple and necessary for the ANSF to represent the “Host Nation” legitimately. We teach 4 basic classes to as many as possible:
COIN Conduct: how to act on the street and how to interact with the population as a representative of the government. This is absolutley necessary to gain the support of the people for the government.
COIN Framework: In this class we teach them basic Afghan history, which most do not know, of how we got here and how the HN and Insurgents are competing for the strategic sympathies of the population and what players are supporting the HN government efforts to win support. Warlords will not win a country’s support, they will dominate areas. Only by instilling a sense of “Nationalism” for a greater good will allow this message to stick. In order to do that the ANSF “foot soldier” must know “why” he is fighting, “What” he is fighting for, and “How” he fits in this picture. This is really what this class teaches him.
COIN Fundamentals: Not the 3-24 or 3-24.2 version, but a simplified version that contains basic principles any soldier can understand.
Insurgent Fundamentals: A basic understanding of the historical principles that insurgents follow. Strategies and dynamics, done in a way that the average ANSF member can understand what Ideology is and how the Narrative of an ideology can be used against their efforts.
In running around this country, teaching ANSF or observing, I have found that most had no idea why they were fighting, that corruption was wrong, or that they were even members of the HN government. This is what we are trying to combat. We can teach them all the combined arms and MAGTF’ery we want, but if they do not realize why they fight, who/what they are fighting for…we are just arming and training better insurgents of the future.
Rest assured our goal has not been to make them COIN SMEs, but rather to teach them the basic principles of how to Clear and area without harming the innocents, how to Hold and area without extorting the local population, and how to Build and area through the HN government and its supporters. If we can get that common message infused into the “Force” we call the ANSF, at least they will serve the greater good in the long run.
As a 17 year law enforcement officer and 10 years from the Metropolitan Police Department of Washington DC. I currently serve as an Advisor to the Afghan National Police. As a police officer from DC Police, I have a vast experience dealing with community oriented policing (COP). I worked COP for a few years. The strategy for COP is to turn it to intelligence led COP. As you all know, in any counter insurgency the populace is the most important factor in winning the counter insurgency. Therefore, conducting patrols in villages, speaking with the Elders, Mullahs establishing a good rapport with the community is what this is about. Aslo, obtaining sources
because without HUMINT, we can’t defeat the insurgency. HUMINT is one of the most important factors in defeating the insurgents.
One must know the police is a community based governemnt entity. Through COP the police can obtain information on the whereabouts of criminals.
On the security side of COIN, COP is easily established. In COIN, as established, the populace is important to turn the tide or just to have them on the side of the gov’t. Therefore, COP needs to be built into COIN,
which in my opinion, it alredy is.
The military is unaware about the functions of police officers and police operations. The military needs to understand the ANA is not a community based gov’t entity. They don’t have that connection with the populace. Furthermore, COP is not the function of the ANA.
You are attempting to teach COP to the ANA in a COIN setting. Let the police do the policing, and let the ANA do military funtions. They should not cross.
Massachusetts State Police initiated a pilot program during the fall of 2009 at the north end of Springfield Massachusetts. A high crime area of gangs, violence and drugs. Below is the project we initiated. Utilizing the eight COIN principles to combat gangs and drug dealers.
Lessons From the Battlefield: Counter-Insurgency for Domestic Law Enforcement
Springfield, Massachusetts, was ranked the 12th most dangerous city in America and had a rampant gang problem. A rise in crime and gang violence was exacerbated by budgetary restraints on the police force. Massachusetts State Trooper Michael Cutone had recently returned from a tour of duty in Iraq where he and Trooper Thomas Sarrouf had played essential roles in a Special Operations mission in the Avghani region of Iraq. In the fall of 2009, Cutone, with the support of his commanders, met with Springfield Police Department Deputy Chief John Barbieri to discuss how the Avghani Counterinsurgency Operations (COIN) model could be adapted to law enforcement operations and integrated into an overall strategy to address the crime problem in the North End. After weeks of planning, a shooting in late October served as the catalyst to begin coordinated law enforcement efforts and the development of the Counter Criminal Continuum (C3) Policing methodology. Drawing upon the principles of community-oriented and intelligence-led policing, integrated with the military counterinsurgency model and lessons learned at Avghani, law enforcement in Springfield has made great inroads over the past year with limited resources.
Following links cover Massachusetts State Police utilizing COIN principles (C3 Policing methods) to combat gangs and drug dealers.
International Association of Chiefs of Police 2011 National Conference at Chicago
http://www.policechiefmagazine.org/magazine/index.cfm?fuseaction=display&article_id=2475&issue_id=92011
Westminster Institute Washington D.C.
http://www.westminster-institute.org/announcements/lessons-from-the-battlefield-counter-insurgency-for-domestic-law-enforcement-december-15-900-1100am/
Lessons From the Battlefield: Counter-Insurgency for Domestic Law Enforcement
Presented by Lt. Michael Domnarski and Trooper Michael Cutone Massachusetts State Police
Foreign Law Enforcement utilizing COIN principles would be successful against insurgents (see Avghani model Iraq 2005-06. (US Army Magazine May 2008 issue) http://www.ausa.org/publications/armymagazine/archive/2008/5/Documents/Grip_0508.pdf
NPR Story: Counter-Insurgency Tactics Used to Reduce Crime in Springfield
Anne Mostue August 22, 2011
Listen now: local-wfcr-982860
SPRINGFIELD, MA (wfcr) – A new way to end violent crime in Springfield seems to be working. In one neighborhood, Massachusetts state police are on the beat alongside city officers. They are using what’s described as “military counterinsurgency tactics.” One state trooper is behind the collaboration. As New England Public Radio’s Anne Mostue reports, he says he saw a new use for skills he learned in the U.S. Army. © Copyright 2011, wfcr
MSP C3 Policing (Massachusetts State Police web site on C3 Policing)
http://mspc3policing.com/
Respectfully,
Tpr. Michael Cutone
Massachusetts State Police
email: [email protected]