Member Login Become a Member
Advertisement

New Interagency COIN Manual (Updated)

  |  
12.06.2007 at 10:51pm

Via e-mail, Inside the Pentagon report of a new Interagency COIN manual in the works:

The State Department is leading an effort to issue a draft version of a counterinsurgency guide in the next four to six weeks to help Washington-based government agencies and departments defeat future subversive movements. A final doctrine is expected next year.

The effort follows last year’s Army and Marine Corps manual on the same subject.

The new guide — “Counterinsurgency for U.S. Government Policymakers: A Work in Progress” — is an educational, strategic-level primer for senior policymakers, according to a State Department official in the bureau of political-military affairs.

He spoke with Inside the Pentagon this week on condition of anonymity.

The guide is different from the military manual, which is used at the operational-tactical level, the official said.

“It’s inspired by that but we found that we needed to do some counterinsurgency 101 across the entire government including within State,” the official said. He added the draft guide speaks to the importance of coordinated interagency assistance to the affected governments, “to help them provide security and effective governance,” and spells out what planning and assessment tools are available.

The United States and its allies are fighting two counterinsurgencies in Afghanistan and Iraq, respectively, prompting the establishment of new doctrines based on lessons gained from these battles…

Encouraging news on a much needed addition to our COIN doctrine database. That said, there is still much work to be done before we have a workable Interagency process in place.

Update: Greg Grant, Government Executive, has more on the new Counterinsurgency for U.S. Government Policy Makers: A Work in Progress manual.

State’s Bureau of Political-Military Affairs led the effort, which was informed in part by the counterinsurgency experiences of Australia and the United Kingdom. Former Australian Army officer David Kilcullen, who recently served as an adviser to U.S. Army Gen. David Petraeus in Iraq, is overseeing an interagency effort to produce a civilian counterinsurgency doctrine, which is due out in early 2008.

The guide is the first serious government-wide effort to create a national counterinsurgency framework since the Kennedy administration tried to stem the spread of communism in Vietnam in 1962. At that time, there was extensive interagency involvement in rural development and security efforts, particularly by USAID, which at one point had nearly 15,000 officers serving in Vietnam.

The manual combines current counterinsurgency theory with lessons learned by personnel from State, USAID, the military and other agencies. Drafters emphasized that it is not an academic document, but aims to fill a hole that exists because there is no civilian agency publication on counterinsurgency to complement the new Army and Marine Corps counterinsurgency manual.

According to the guide, insurgency is “armed politics,” and while military action is essential to establishing security, only political resolution will lead to ultimate success. The guide recommends that civilian and military efforts join in an integrated “clear, hold and build” strategy that focuses on first on securing the populace, then on long-term economic development assistance — a clear reference to the counterinsurgency strategy being applied in Iraq under Petraeus.

The guide also emphasizes the importance of providing information in counterinsurgency operations to create a narrative enhancing an embattled government’s legitimacy. Such a narrative, it says, “must resonate with the population and be based upon verifiable facts and measurable progress rather than promises.” The primary effort must be seen by the local population as indigenous, because only a local government can mobilize the support of its people against an insurgent movement, the drafters wrote.

More at Government Executive.

About The Author

Article Discussion: