Member Login Become a Member
Advertisement
Blogs

Media AWOL in exposing Iraq War’s years of ineptitude

  |  
01.03.2012 at 09:16am

Media AWOL in exposing Iraq War’s years of ineptitude

by Edward Wasserman

The Miami Herald

The U.S. war in Iraq ended just before Christmas, and if you blinked you probably missed it. TV news coaxed some seasonal sentiment out of the troops getting home for the holidays, but the Sunday-morning talk shows — where news of consequence is usually autopsied — barely noticed. The Beltway sages had weightier matters to discuss, such as the Gingrich ascendancy and the latest congressional standoff.The silence was understandable because the topic is so awkward. The Iraq war wasn’t a defeat, like Vietnam. But it wasn’t a win either: Saddam Hussein is long gone, but the strategic menace the invasion was meant to thwart was bogus, the installation of democracy seems shaky at best, and the country seems on the verge of tearing itself apart again. Besides, the Iraq victory lap was used up back in 2003 when George W. Bush, in a supreme moment of presidential buffoonery, pranced across a carrier deck in flight regalia to declare peace just as a calamitous civil war was starting.So while the news media might like to imply that the war concluded successfully, that’s a hard case to make, especially with our Iraqi friends referring to it as a “foreign occupation.” And faced with a perplexing moment of historical ambiguity, the media did what they do whenever a clean story line eludes them — change the subject.Our country isn’t unique in making war needlessly, but we may be unique in our insouciance. Attention really should be paid. After all, destroying another country is a big deal. Between 105,000 and 130,000 Iraqi civilians died violently, and half a million more were lost to degraded infrastructure, lousy healthcare and other miseries caused by years of murderous strife uncorked by the U.S. invasion. Some two million Iraqis are now refugees, and hundreds of thousands of ordinary lives have been mutilated.You’d think some sort of examination is in order: Congressional hearings? A truth and reconciliation commission? At least, an extended segment on 60 Minutes?
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

About The Author

Article Discussion:

0 0 votes
Article Rating
10 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
TM

This is a pretty unbelievable rant.

The negative consequences of the Iraq war that the author lists are common knowledge and are generally the only things that much of the public knows about our involvement in Iraq. He essentially blasts the media for not parroting conventional wisdom for one more day after they have done so for 8 years. News coverage of the war has been overwhelmingly negative, critical, and often excessively so ever since we invaded. Now, when our troops finally withdraw, he is angry that we permit ourselves a few sighs of relief?

This is a great example of the irrational discourse that characterized our 8 years in Iraq, from the initial justification to invade, to the partisan bickering that surrounded every funding supplemental, to the politicization of every major military decision, to the portrayal of every service member who so much as donned a uniform at any time since 9/11 as a victim, martyr, or superhero.

The author advocates more anger, more partisanship, and more finger-pointing. Perhaps what we need is to step back, take a deep breath, and revisit these issues when we we are capable of analyzing them with less emotion, fewer partisan motivations, and less emphasis on assigning blame for real or imagined missteps or injustices.

0
View Replies (7)
Ken White

An opinion piece proving yet again that living in alternate realities can be, umm, interesting…

0
motorfirebox

I understand the bitterness, but there just isn’t anything more to say. Every time the topic comes up, I just want to shout “We shouldn’t have been there in the first place!” over and over again at the top of my lungs, and I imagine those who disagree with me have similar urges with different wording. That’s not really news.

0