Small Wars Journal

The Laptop Is Mightier Than the Sword

Fri, 06/15/2007 - 12:32pm
SWJ Editors Note - the following excerpt is from an article by Bing West and Owen West and was originally posted at the New York Times.

The Laptop Is Mightier Than the Sword

By Owen West and Bing West

While waiting to see if the Iraq surge strategy pays off, President Bush and Defense Secretary Robert Gates have shown Gen. Peter Pace, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the door and brought in Lt. Gen. Douglas Lute as the new White House "war czar." Well, they can shift senior leadership all they want, but unless they give our troops patrolling the streets the tools they need, our leaders are going to see this strategy fizzle.

Part of the problem was that when the military surge was announced, it became commonplace for officials to assert that political compromise, not military force, would determine the outcome of the war. This vacuous idea would startle George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, Mao Zedong and Ho Chi Minh, to mention only a few unlikely bedfellows who forged success during an insurgency.

Buying time with American lives is not a military mission. No platoon commander tells his soldiers to go out and tread water so the politicians can talk. The goal of American soldiers is to identify and kill or capture the Shiite death squads and Sunni insurgents.

What is keeping them from doing so? The war in Iraq would be over in a week if the insurgents wore uniforms. Instead, they hide in plain sight, and Iraqi and American soldiers have no means of checking the true identity and history of anyone they stop.

This is inexcusable. In Vietnam, the mobility of the Vietcong guerrilla forces was eventually crippled by a laborious hamlet-level census completed by hand in 1968. Biometric tracking and databases have since made extraordinary advances, yet our vaunted technical experts have failed at this elementary task in Iraq....

More at the New York Times...

Comments

Checking everyone by a laptop or biometric system?

With the greatest of respect, I fail to see how such a technological solution is feasible, based on the evidence of the apparent problems with a 500,000 person "no fly" list.

The Iraqi population is about 26 million, so it is difficult to imagine how a ten million plus database of Iraqi males is going to be administered, and that is assuming that there is no corruption.

I won't even begin to comment on the operational use of such a system because its outside my experience.