Since the early 1990s, the defense industry has been talking about the revolutionary technological changes taking place across society. It has worked hard to ensure we know what those changes are and how they are affecting national security. Yet, the industry rarely talks about the fundamental requirement to change the way we think in order to understand the implications of the technological and social changes we face...
...The authors of these works highlight aspects of how the world has changed. This forces us to change how we frame problems, how we organize to deal with them and even how to get the best out of our people. For instance, if one still saw the world as a hierarchy, then one looked for the "leadership" of the Iraqi insurgency in 2003. Yet if one saw the world as a network in which emergent intelligence is a key factor, then one quickly saw the networked insurgent entities as they evolved an emergent strategy in Iraq. Our ability to adjust to the rapidly changing future security environment will, to a large degree, depend on our ability to understand the world as it is rather than as we have been taught to understand it. Reading these 12 books should help.
Continue on to AFJ for TX Hammes' read different reading list.
Comments
Thanks Schmedlap - <i>Proceedings</i> has given permission to post the <a href="http://smallwarsjournal.com/blog/2008/08/the-2008-warlord-loop-reading/… Loop Reading List</a> which I did to <i>SWJ</i> Blog.
There is also a very good (very long, too) list in this month's issue of Proceedings. Several people each recommend two books and the recommenders are a virtual who's who list of heavy-brained folks on par with the authors for the SWJ blog listed in the column to the right. Unfortunately, I do not see it on their website, so I cannot post a link, but it is on page 48 of the current (August) issue.
Side note: also a good article in the same issue about the SOUTHCOM Commander urging junior officers to "read, think, write - and publish" with the editors pointing out former Admirals who wrote articles in Proceedings as junior officers "without negative repurcussions to their careers."