Small Wars Journal

A Ukraine Foreign Legion?

Thu, 09/04/2014 - 3:01am

A Ukraine Foreign Legion?

Gary Anderson

Vladimir Putin is very confident that he can create a puppet state in the eastern Ukraine. So far, the United States and NATO have proven to be enablers of that ambition. By ruling out direct military intervention and counting on sanctions, which Putin obviously feels he can ride out, the west has built him a big sand box in which to to play. The Ukrainian Army is underequipped and frankly not very good. By arming separatist militias and backing them up with thinly disguised Russian troops when they underperform, the Russian leader sees very little cost in continuing his adventures as he is riding high popularity ratings. The tepid response of the western powers is not just a failure of leadership; it is a failure of imagination. There are other options available to make Putin pay a price.

Although it has not hit the front pages in the west, Russian Army “volunteers” have begun coming home in boxes, and some of the mothers are upset. It is a small protest, but it is a start. We need to remember that the 2003 invasion of Iraq was popular until Americans started dying in large numbers in a seemingly open ended war. Perhaps it is time to counter Putin’s surrogate war with one of our own. The west has the option of funding a volunteer group of skilled veterans under Ukrainian control and arming them with state of the art precision guided munitions to begin plinking Russian tanks, armored personnel carriers and artillery. Once skilled snipers start picking off the eager Russian speaking volunteers that the separatists employ, they may become much less enthusiastic; war becomes a lot less fun when somebody that knows what he is doing is shooting back.

Maintaining legions of non-native troops is not new. France and Spain still maintain Foreign Legions; why not the Ukraine? The United States is no stranger to such approaches. Prior to Pearl Harbor, the Americans funded and equipped a group of flyers called the American Volunteer Group to assist the Chinese in their war against a Japanese invasion. The “Flying Tigers” gave the Japanese fits. These organizations are well within the laws of warfare if they wear uniforms and act as part of a nation-state’s armed forces.

The United States and most NATO nations have scores of veterans who operated as contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan, Many are now unemployed or underemployed with the wind down of those conflicts. Operating in hunter-killer teams in eastern Ukraine, a foreign legion would give teeth to Ukraine’s armed forces that they presently lack. Faced with a real war and the casualties that one entails, Putin and his surrogates would have something to think seriously about in pursuing their present course. The Russians would loudly complain about the use of “foreign mercenaries”, but that would be a case of the pot calling the kettle unkind names. A Ukrainian Foreign Legion would be on solid ground legally while the Russian actions are not. A sovereign state has the right to defend itself and all of the legal precedents are in place for the Ukraine.

The last time the United States resorted to arming a resistance group against Russian aggression was Afghanistan. Although successful in the short run, the effort backfired long term as some of the more radical Afghan resistance fighters turned their guns against us in the guise of al Qaeda. We found that waging irregular warfare can be a two edged sword. That is a good argument for keeping surrogates under state sponsored control. State sponsored foreign legions can be called off when the other side decides to stop fighting and start talking; non-state militias are not so easy to rein in.

At the present time, neither the Ukraine nor the western powers have much leverage in the Ukrainian civil war. A Ukrainian Foreign Legion could well give the Russians and their pet Russian speaking Ukrainian militias pause to think about pursuing political, vice military, solutions to their differences with the legal Ukrainian government. The alternative of giving lethal aid to the Ukrainian republic will take time and training even if the west decides to render such aid. In the meantime, if his surrogates get in trouble, Putin can send in regular Russian reinforcements in mufti very quickly; eventually, we will have a fait accompli and Putin a whetted appetite. A Ukrainian Foreign Legion might save Russia from its own folly, and if it works we might try it in Iraq.

Comments

I am just back from my most recent trip to Ukraine and I can tell you that the number of foreigners fighting for Ukraine is minimal. Unfortunately certain individual [useful idiots] are more than willing to swallow Russian propaganda...Gary has an interesting idea and maybe the Europeans and US would pay for it to absolve their forgetting to honor the 1994 Budapest Memorandum in which the USA, western nations and Russia promised to respect the borders and sovereignty
of Ukraine if they gave up their nuclear weapons.

Spain does not maintain Foreign Legion, it did have one in the past but now is just another infantry unit called "Legion" and what foreigners serve in it (citizens from several south american countries) could have joined a plethora of other units in the Spanish armed forces.

nrogeiro

Thu, 09/04/2014 - 9:10am

1. The movement protesting the death of Russian soldiers in this clandestine war is growing: we have the Cargo 200 movement of Elena Vasilieva and others, based in Murmansk, already with 13.500 relatives of military inscribed, the actions of the Valetina Melnikova et al Union of the Committees of Mothers of the Soldiers (whose St. Petesburg Chapter was just considered by a local court a «foreign agent»), who revealed the August 13 Snizhne debacle of a whole paratrooper regiment, the enquiries of Sergei Krivshenko end Ella Polyakova,both members of the (president Putin's constituted) Commission on Human Rights, claiming that since August there were at least 2.000 deaths from regular soldiers in Ukr. soil,the new movement LostIvan (now in FB and Twitter)and of course the dangerous effort of MP Lev Schlossberg, who has been conducting a big enquiry on the death of the Pskov paratroopers. There is also the planned 12 September parents demonstration in front of the Kremlin. Is it small, is it big, how big can it get, etc...?

2. «International Brigades» are formed in both sides. One unintended consequence of Russian intervention is the creation of a veteran Chechen SF unit. The Ukrainians have been reluctant to use them, but they all acquired now the country's citizenship. Of course there are also Chechens in the Russian side, around the Vostok unit and others.

3. Motivation is of interest. «Ideology» or «post ideology», «religion», «nationalism» and «internationalism», etc. You see «far right» and «left» groups in both camps, but there are more «rightists» in the Russian side, around the ultra-nationalist and some say «neo-Nazi» Russian National Unity movement, that has been recruiting heavily under Mr. Barkashov. Furious debates are taking place in Trotskyite circles and forums on the need not to cooperate with «chauvinists» and «reactionaries» from both sides. But this would require a large interesting political science study.

N. Rogeiro
Lisbon
Portugal

Mark Sleboda

Thu, 09/04/2014 - 3:43am

As if battalions of Western (fascist) mercs arent already repressing, murdering, and ethnic cleansing the people of the Donbass for the West-backed Putsch regime occupying Kiev. That's not enough for you?

http://www.aljazeera.com/video/europe/2014/06/neo-fascists-train-fight-…

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/ukraine/11025137/Ukrai…

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-28329329

- US Navy Vet, 6 years Nuclear Engineering, with in-laws fighting (and a couple of them so far dying) for their lives, families, home, freedom, and way of life against the West-backed Putsch regime occupying Kiev that is attacking them to cement its reign over the whole country.