Small Wars Journal

The Anatomy of the Long War's Failings

Tue, 06/16/2009 - 2:16am
The Anatomy of the Long War's Failings - Frank G. Hoffman, Foreign Policy Research Institute.

What we now sometimes refer to as the Long War began much earlier than the 9/11 attacks on America. But that day was seared into our collective national consciousness and animated our collective response. That sunny morning in Manhattan marked the second most violent day in U.S. history, exceeding Pearl Harbor and even D-Day in fatalities. Only Antietam's bloody wheat fields have witnessed more carnage in a single day. Since then, our country has mobilized for a global conflict against extremism with a multidimensional approach that has relied heavily on our military forces.

Just what have we accomplished to date in the Long War? Any ledger is going to identify some clear gains. Our campaign in Afghanistan quickly toppled the Taliban, and as a result al Qaeda no longer enjoys any sanctuary in Afghanistan. A major multinational invasion of Iraq led by the United States sliced though the remnants of the Iraqi Army and destroyed Saddam Hussein's regime. We have generated and exploited a degree of international cooperation and intelligence sharing—much of it very discrete—to foil several plots against ourselves or our partners. We have substantially reduced al Qaeda's infrastructure around the world, including its leadership, training facilities, and financial networks. And the nation has begun to shore up our home defenses. Notably, no similar attacks have occurred here at home.

But the ledger has both black and red ink. Bin Laden is alive and apparently well, although al Qaeda is a more diffuse organization. The core leadership of al Qaeda itself has probably been weakened, but its cause has been amplified and a generation of Muslims has been mobilized if not radicalized.

Afghanistan remains a key campaign in this war. Our initial campaign was brilliantly conceived by the CIA. An American force of CIA operatives and special forces aided no more than 15,000 Afghan troops to drive out some 50,000 Taliban and foreign fighters in late 2001. But six years later, Afghanistan remains a troubled land. The Taliban, once vanquished, is resurging.

Like the early phases in Afghanistan, the early military operations in Iraq were also conducted in accord with the U.S. military's preferred style and exploited its overwhelming conventional military superiority. The early successes were ephemeral and temporary. The early occupation of Iraq went well for six months, but then turned sour as political enemies vied for national and local control. What Tom Ricks has called perhaps the worst war plan in American history" failed to secure victory as defined by our political leaders. The planning shortfalls helped create the conditions for the difficult occupation that followed. For two years, American commanders and diplomats looked for a way out, and tried to nurture along a weak government in Baghdad and shift the fight to the slowly developing Iraqi Army.

The cost for what has been accomplished to date is completely disproportionate to the limited gains. How did we get to this point?

Much more at FPRI.

Comments

Schmedlap

Tue, 06/16/2009 - 3:03am

<I>"The cost for what has been accomplished to date is completely disproportionate to the limited gains."</I>

Limited gains? Pakistan is now fighting in the tribal areas. Violence is down in Iraq and we are beginning to withdraw our forces. Afghanistan is far from won, but it is not an AQ safe haven and the war isn't over. So Bin Laden is alive? And? The author points out the magnitude of the attack on 9/11, then points out that AQ has been damaged and our country has not been attacked since 9/11, despite attempts to do so, but then asserts "limited gains." Huh?

There are also ancillary benefits. Rather than just fielding next generation equipment, we are actually field testing it and continually refining it based upon real world feedback, as opposed to just taking whatever some defense contractor says that we need. Our forces are focused on preparation for war rather than preparation for the next safety inspection. Our units are far more lethal and experienced, better equipped and trained, and we are now recruiting people who want to fight more so than people who want to wear a spiffy uniform. Our military overall has been reborn from the 1990s paper tiger that it was. We've also begun to rebuild our neglected intelligence capabilities that were allowed to atrophy for nearly a decade.

Most importantly, after 8 years of war, Americans are more accustomed to casualties in war. That is essential if we are going to fight and win the messy one coming up in Afghanistan/Pakistan.