In the Nation’s Defense – New York Post editorial
How Soon We Forget – New York Daily News editorial
Reward for Military Service – Washington Post editorial
Thanks for the Troops – Elizabeth Robbins, Washington Post
Still in Iraq’s Grasp – William Quinn, Washington Post
Vietnam Remembered – Jan Scruggs, Washington Times
Country Worth Fighting For – London Daily Telegraph editorial
Pause to Honour Those Who Fought – Toronto Star editorial
Lest We Forget – David Cameron, London Daily Telegraph
Lest We Forget – Harriet Cooper, Toronto Star
Lest We Forget – Jseche Lam, Toronto Star
Call on All Americans to Serve – Peter Kauffmann, New York Daily News
U.S.-Turkey Alliance Too Valuable to Jeopardize – Norman Stone, Wall Street Journal
Diversity Roiling Muslim World – Thomas Friedman, New York Times
Finishing the Job in Afghanistan – Hans Binnendijk, Wall Street Journal
Define the War on Terror – Los Angeles Times editorial
Intelligence: Curveball, Swing and a Miss – George Will, Washington Post
Musharraf Must Go – Washington Post editorial
Musharraf Goes Splat – Jim Hoagland, Washington Post
Musharraf’s Second Face – Martin Schram, Washington Times
Not for Miliband to Sort out Pakistan’s Mess – Simon Jenkins, London Times
Picking Through Pakistan’s Clichés - Haroon Siddiqui, Toronto Star
Nuclear Flashpoints Made in Pakistan – Frantz and Collins, Washington Post
Tense Daily Grind for Palestinians – Robert Cotton Fite, Chicago Tribune
Dueling Over Darfur - Newsweek Magazine debate
Hugo Chavez’s Coup – Oliver North, Washington Times
Hasta La Vista, Colombia – Jan Thomson, Washington Times
Sanctions and Rouges – William Hawkins, Washington Times
Ordinary Law Can’t Deal With Terrorists – Alistair Palmer, London Daily Telegraph
Stuart Herrington on Waterboarding – Tom Ricks, Washington Post
Waterboarding No Big Deal – Jack Kelly, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
The Spy Who Wants Israel to Talk – David Ignatius, Washington Post



Comments (3)
If you only have time to read one piece out of the OpEd Roundup - I'd recommend William Quinn's observations in the "Still in Iraq's Grasp" piece. It is both a very personal piece which speaks to individual commitment, but because of the University he is at, it speaks to some of the disconnects between those who go on to advise policy, make policy, advocate on issues, and execute policy from inside the beltway to the tactical boots on the ground.
He does not seek to judge, just consider.
William, we appreciate your reflections and your decision to go on to serve as an officer through your university's ROTC program. Your candor, courage, and curiosity will make you a fine leader, and serve the country well.
Best Regards, Rob
Posted by Rob Thornton
|
November 11, 2007 9:55 AM
Rob:
Agree 100%. It was a fine piece that gets at the middle ground that returning vets face in America after serving in places like Iraq and Afghanistan. The article deftly touches on the separation between combat veterans and their experience and a largely uniformed civil society over the war, although without grounding itself in militarism.
Ditto to Rob's thanks to Mr Quinn for his service to the nation.
gian
Posted by Gian P Gentile
|
November 11, 2007 10:56 AM
Thank you Rob, for calling attention to William Quinn's piece. It a true observation of the way the homefront has viewed all our wars since the end of WW II.
I was reminded of simliar experiences on my return to civilian life in 1969. College campuses for all the hype about anti-war movements were mostly filled with students looking after their own self interest.
I also add my Ditto to Rob and Gian's, and extend a "thank you for your service" to all on this site who have answered the call to serve their nation.
Posted by historyguy99
|
November 11, 2007 1:46 PM